Monthly Hardware & Software Integration Status Report

Track and analyze the integration progress, quality metrics, and development milestones across hardware and software components, focusing on build success rates, testing coverage, and cross-team collaboration effectiveness to ensure successful product delivery.

Report Objective

Monitor the integration health of hardware and software components, tracking build success rates, test coverage, defect trends, and milestone progress to ensure alignment between teams and identify potential risks early in the development cycle.

Integration Build Health

Line chart showing daily build success rates and integration test pass rates

Questions to Consider:

2025-02-012025-03-012025-04-01date84.0%86.0%88.0%90.0%build_success_ratebuild_success_rateHow are build success rates trending?Build success rates show overall stability with room for improvement
  • What is the overall trend in build stability?

  • Are there specific days or periods with notably lower success rates?

  • How do current rates compare to target thresholds?

  • What is the correlation between build success and test pass rates?

  • Are there consistent patterns in test failures?

  • How stable are the integration tests themselves?

2025-02-012025-03-012025-04-01date78.0%80.0%82.0%integration_test_pass_rateintegration_test_pass_rateHow are integration tests performing?Integration test pass rates indicate testing effectiveness

Cross-Component Testing Coverage

Bar chart displaying test coverage metrics by component and severity

Questions to Consider:

Core HardwareFirmwareDevice DriversAPI Layercomponent_name0.0%500.0%1000.0%1500.0%sum(test_coverage)sum(test_coverage)How is test coverage distributed across components?Test coverage varies significantly by component
  • Which components need increased test coverage?

  • How does coverage align with component complexity?

  • Are there specific types of tests missing?

  • Are all critical paths adequately covered?

  • Which components have coverage gaps in critical functionality?

  • How does this impact release readiness?

Core HardwareFirmwareDevice DriversAPI Layercomponent_name0.0%500.0%1000.0%1500.0%2000.0%sum(critical_path_coverage)sum(critical_path_coverage)What is our critical path test coverage?Critical path coverage meets minimum thresholds but varies by component

Integration Issues and Dependencies

Table showing open integration issues by priority and component

Questions to Consider:

HighMediumCriticalLowpriority050100150sum(issue_count)sum(issue_count)What is the distribution of open integration issues?Integration issues by priority level show areas needing attention
  • What is the balance of issue priorities?

  • Are high-priority issues being addressed promptly?

  • How has the backlog changed month over month?

  • Are resolution times meeting SLA targets?

  • Which types of issues take longest to resolve?

  • How can we improve resolution efficiency?

HighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumCriticalLowHighMediumLowHighLowpriority2.04.06.08.010.0sum(avg_resolution_days)How quickly are integration issues being resolved?Resolution times vary by priority with some concerning outliers